[Haskell-cafe] Standard package file format

Brandon Allbery allbery.b at gmail.com
Sat Sep 17 07:00:47 UTC 2016

On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 2:54 AM, Imants Cekusins <imantc at gmail.com> wrote:

> currently both config content (let's call it a *model*) and
> representation (*view*: specific config file type) are bundled.
> if a common *model *is agreed on*,* package tool and IDE devs could pick
> any *view (*format*)* that best suits their / users needs.
> such fragmentation would not break the workflow. If someone thinks of a
> convenient format and believe it worth their time to write a *controller*
> for it, why not?

Do I have to obtain whatever whizzy new controller you've come up with in
order to work with your packages?
Do I have to do this when everyone has come up with their own whizzy new
controller and I need to fit their packages into whatever I am trying to

brandon s allbery kf8nh                               sine nomine associates
allbery.b at gmail.com                                  ballbery at sinenomine.net
unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad        http://sinenomine.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell-cafe/attachments/20160917/2d322607/attachment.html>

More information about the Haskell-Cafe mailing list