Haddock tree spongled

[Boespflug, Mathieu]

If the status quo is poor, then why not merge the two? git-subtree won't
fix the problem and will arguably be even harder to manage than submodules.

Best,

On Wed, 6 Mar 2019 at 15:59, Ben Gamari <ben at smart-cactus.org> wrote:

> Sylvain Henry <sylvain at haskus.fr> writes:
>
> > Why don't we just put Haddock into GHC's repository? It was proposed in
> > a previous discussion in February [1] and it would avoid the bad
> > experience of having it as a submodule while keeping it in sync.
> >
> I'm reluctant to keep it in the GHC tree; it really is a separate
> project with separate maintainership, dependencies, and contributors.
>
> That being said, I do agree that the status quo is pretty poor. I was
> going to suggest managing it with git-subtree instead, but I'm not sure
> this would be much of an improvement.
>
> Cheers,
>
>  - Ben
> _______________________________________________
> ghc-devs mailing list
> ghc-devs at haskell.org
> http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/ghc-devs/attachments/20190306/3abedb2f/attachment.html>