[xmonad] Changing module headers

Ivan Lazar Miljenovic ivan.miljenovic at gmail.com
Sun Dec 20 00:06:03 EST 2009

Gwern Branwen <gwern0 at gmail.com> writes:
> As I said already: sim is not broken. Our conventions are broken. The
> headers have massive duplication, and sim is reporting the duplication
> exactly as it should.

Just because we have reptition doesn't mean our conventions are
"broken"; inefficient maybe, but I wouldn't even really consider it to
be "duplication".

Besides, M-q in Emacs helps with editing... ;-)

Ivan Lazar Miljenovic
Ivan.Miljenovic at gmail.com

More information about the xmonad mailing list