[xmonad] Changing module headers
Ivan Lazar Miljenovic
ivan.miljenovic at gmail.com
Sun Dec 20 00:06:03 EST 2009
Gwern Branwen <gwern0 at gmail.com> writes:
> As I said already: sim is not broken. Our conventions are broken. The
> headers have massive duplication, and sim is reporting the duplication
> exactly as it should.
Just because we have reptition doesn't mean our conventions are
"broken"; inefficient maybe, but I wouldn't even really consider it to
be "duplication".
Besides, M-q in Emacs helps with editing... ;-)
--
Ivan Lazar Miljenovic
Ivan.Miljenovic at gmail.com
IvanMiljenovic.wordpress.com
More information about the xmonad
mailing list