What top-level names are “allocated”?

[Wolfgang Jeltsch]

I think, “Reactive” would be much better. Most modules about reactivity
are FRP libraries anyhow. If we would have “FRP” as a top-level name,
where would the few non-functional reactive libraries fit into? As I
said, I plan to move from “FRP” to “Reactive” for Grapefruit anyhow.

All the best,
Wolfgang

Am Freitag, den 17.02.2017, 10:14 -0600 schrieb amindfv at gmail.com:
> "FRP" seems like something we could make an allocated name.
> 
> Tom
> 
> 
> > 
> > El 17 feb 2017, a las 08:45, Wolfgang Jeltsch <g9ks157k at acme.softbas
> > e.org> escribió:
> > 
> > Hi!
> > 
> > When uploading a new version of grapefruit-frp yesterday, I got the
> > following warning from cabal-install:
> > 
> > > 
> > >  Exposed modules use unallocated top-level names: FRP
> >
> > This made me wonder which top-level names are actually “allocated”.
> > I tried to find this out from the Cabal sources, but the GitHub
> > search functionality revealed no occurrences of the word
> > “unallocated”.
> > 
> > Regarding my concrete case, I think it would be good to change “FRP”
> > to “Reactive”, which is what Reactive Banana is using, for example.
> > However, is “Reactive” an “allocated” top-level name?
> > 
> > All the best,
> > Wolfgang