Re: What top-level names are “allocated”?

[amindfv at gmail.com]

"FRP" seems like something we could make an allocated name.

Tom


> El 17 feb 2017, a las 08:45, Wolfgang Jeltsch <g9ks157k at acme.softbase.org> escribió:
> 
> Hi!
> 
> When uploading a new version of grapefruit-frp yesterday, I got the
> following warning from cabal-install:
> 
>>  Exposed modules use unallocated top-level names: FRP
> 
> This made me wonder which top-level names are actually “allocated”.
> I tried to find this out from the Cabal sources, but the GitHub search
> functionality revealed no occurrences of the word “unallocated”.
> 
> Regarding my concrete case, I think it would be good to change “FRP” to
> “Reactive”, which is what Reactive Banana is using, for example.
> However, is “Reactive” an “allocated” top-level name?
> 
> All the best,
> Wolfgang
> _______________________________________________
> Libraries mailing list
> Libraries at haskell.org
> http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries