Re: What top-level names are “allocated”?

[Alexey Vagarenko]

Forgive me, but what does "allocated top-level name" mean?

2017-02-17 20:27 GMT+05:00 Wolfgang Jeltsch <g9ks157k at acme.softbase.org>:

> I think, “Reactive” would be much better. Most modules about reactivity
> are FRP libraries anyhow. If we would have “FRP” as a top-level name,
> where would the few non-functional reactive libraries fit into? As I
> said, I plan to move from “FRP” to “Reactive” for Grapefruit anyhow.
>
> All the best,
> Wolfgang
>
> Am Freitag, den 17.02.2017, 10:14 -0600 schrieb amindfv at gmail.com:
> > "FRP" seems like something we could make an allocated name.
> >
> > Tom
> >
> >
> > >
> > > El 17 feb 2017, a las 08:45, Wolfgang Jeltsch <g9ks157k at acme.softbas
> > > e.org> escribió:
> > >
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > When uploading a new version of grapefruit-frp yesterday, I got the
> > > following warning from cabal-install:
> > >
> > > >
> > > >  Exposed modules use unallocated top-level names: FRP
> > >
> > > This made me wonder which top-level names are actually “allocated”.
> > > I tried to find this out from the Cabal sources, but the GitHub
> > > search functionality revealed no occurrences of the word
> > > “unallocated”.
> > >
> > > Regarding my concrete case, I think it would be good to change “FRP”
> > > to “Reactive”, which is what Reactive Banana is using, for example.
> > > However, is “Reactive” an “allocated” top-level name?
> > >
> > > All the best,
> > > Wolfgang
> _______________________________________________
> Libraries mailing list
> Libraries at haskell.org
> http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/libraries/attachments/20170217/fa8f51e6/attachment.html>