Upper bounds in PVP

[MightyByte]

It seems like this issue has clearly been the source of
disagreement/misunderstanding, so +1 from me too.  The harder question
is precisely what changes should be made.

On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 8:38 AM, Austin Seipp <austin at well-typed.com> wrote:
> I also like this change, and a lot of people use RFC2119 formalization
> even without direct reference I find. So I'm +1 on adopting it.
>
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 7:25 AM, Bardur Arantsson <spam at scientician.net> wrote:
>> On 2014-04-10 13:52, Herbert Valerio Riedel wrote:
>>
>>> Just a thought: Maybe the requirement levels stated in the PVP in terms
>>> of may/should/must could benefit from a bit more formalization in terms
>>> of something like RFC2119.
>>>
>>>  [RFC2119]: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2119
>>>
>>
>> +1. (I think that the RFCs terms may actually have been the intended
>> meaning, but it could definitely stand to be spelled out explicitly in
>> either case.)
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Libraries mailing list
>> Libraries at haskell.org
>> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Austin Seipp, Haskell Consultant
> Well-Typed LLP, http://www.well-typed.com/
> _______________________________________________
> Libraries mailing list
> Libraries at haskell.org
> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries