Upper bounds in PVP

[Vincent Hanquez]

On 2014-04-10 13:52, MightyByte wrote:
> It seems like this issue has clearly been the source of
> disagreement/misunderstanding, so +1 from me too.  The harder question
> is precisely what changes should be made.
Oh please.

While it was not explicitely stated as being RFC2119, RFC2119 is still 
*common* *sense*, and probably intented for universal communication with 
non native english speaker.
English speakers (which many PvP original authors are) would have very 
likely the correct (and RFC2119 compliant) understanding of those words.

Also must I say that RFC2119 is a document from 1997, predating the PvP 
by many many years. As Bardur said, "I think that the RFCs terms may 
actually have been the intended
meaning"

Suggesting that this was the source of disagreement/misunderstanding, is 
in my opinion disingenuous at best.

Otherwise I'm all for (+1) spelling out that the PvP is following 
RFC2119; there's no harm for being crystal clear about this.

-- 
Vincent