Upper bounds in PVP

[Austin Seipp]

I also like this change, and a lot of people use RFC2119 formalization
even without direct reference I find. So I'm +1 on adopting it.

On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 7:25 AM, Bardur Arantsson <spam at scientician.net> wrote:
> On 2014-04-10 13:52, Herbert Valerio Riedel wrote:
>
>> Just a thought: Maybe the requirement levels stated in the PVP in terms
>> of may/should/must could benefit from a bit more formalization in terms
>> of something like RFC2119.
>>
>>  [RFC2119]: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2119
>>
>
> +1. (I think that the RFCs terms may actually have been the intended
> meaning, but it could definitely stand to be spelled out explicitly in
> either case.)
>
> _______________________________________________
> Libraries mailing list
> Libraries at haskell.org
> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries
>



-- 
Regards,

Austin Seipp, Haskell Consultant
Well-Typed LLP, http://www.well-typed.com/