Gearing up (again) for the next release: 2014.2.0.0

[harry]

Jens Petersen wrote
>> *Haddock* - is there any reason not to use the version built and
>> distributed with GHC 7.8?
> 
> from the package perspective also, +1 for continuing to use the haddock in
> ghc.

Perhaps Haddock shouldn't be included with GHC either, now that we have HP
for the batteries included distribution?



--
View this message in context: http://haskell.1045720.n5.nabble.com/Gearing-up-again-for-the-next-release-2014-2-0-0-tp5746660p5746881.html
Sent from the Haskell - Libraries mailing list archive at Nabble.com.