Proposal: Add a strict version of <$> for monads

[Johan Tibell]

On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 11:57 AM, Daniel Trstenjak <
daniel.trstenjak at gmail.com> wrote:

>
> On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 10:50:24AM +0100, Johan Tibell wrote:
> > What would be the strict version of <$>?
>
> In my case, it's more about the intuition of the name '<$!>' and less
> about the possibility of a strict version of '<$>'.
>

What's unintuitive about the definition of <$!> above? It's seems like the
only sensible one.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/libraries/attachments/20131220/6c9b2acd/attachment.html>