Proposal: Add a strict version of <$> for monads

Daniel Trstenjak daniel.trstenjak at
Sun Dec 22 09:38:51 UTC 2013

> What's unintuitive about the definition of <$!> above? It's seems like the only sensible one.

Well, call it bikeshedding, but '<$!>' would be defined for Monad and the name might
suggest, that it's defined for Functor.

More information about the Libraries mailing list