Proposal: Add a strict version of <$> for monads

Daniel Trstenjak daniel.trstenjak at gmail.com
Sun Dec 22 09:38:51 UTC 2013


> What's unintuitive about the definition of <$!> above? It's seems like the only sensible one.

Well, call it bikeshedding, but '<$!>' would be defined for Monad and the name might
suggest, that it's defined for Functor.



More information about the Libraries mailing list