Proposal: Add a strict version of <$> for monads

[Daniel Trstenjak]

On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 10:50:24AM +0100, Johan Tibell wrote:
> What would be the strict version of <$>? 

In my case, it's more about the intuition of the name '<$!>' and less
about the possibility of a strict version of '<$>'.


Greetings,
Daniel