Proposal: Add a strict version of <$> for monads

[Johan Tibell]

On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 10:22 AM, John Wiegley <johnw at fpcomplete.com> wrote:

> >>>>> Daniel Trstenjak <daniel.trstenjak at gmail.com> writes:
>
> > There are '$' and '$!', so it's just pity that '<$>' and '<$!>' would
> break
> > this naming consistency, because '<$!>' wouldn't be the strict version of
> > '<$>'.
>
> I agree with Daniel.
>

What would be the strict version of <$>?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/libraries/attachments/20131220/61a5565c/attachment.html>