Why base 4.4.0.0 does not use default signatures extention (new in GHC 7.2)?

[Maciej Marcin Piechotka]

On Fri, 2011-09-23 at 14:46 +0200, Bas van Dijk wrote:
> On 22 September 2011 06:18, Maciej Marcin Piechotka
> <uzytkownik2 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > While the Functor f => (Pointed f =>) Applicative f => Monad f is still
> > discussed the default methods would be a step towards the goal.
> 
> I like it. It's indeed a good step towards:
> 
> http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/DefaultSuperclassInstances
> 
> Why not formally propose this?
> 

Done

> Regards,
> 
> Bas

Regards
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/libraries/attachments/20110923/fe555b5c/attachment.pgp>