Why base 22.214.171.124 does not use default signatures extention (new in GHC 7.2)?
Maciej Marcin Piechotka
uzytkownik2 at gmail.com
Fri Sep 23 22:25:31 CEST 2011
On Fri, 2011-09-23 at 14:46 +0200, Bas van Dijk wrote:
> On 22 September 2011 06:18, Maciej Marcin Piechotka
> <uzytkownik2 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > While the Functor f => (Pointed f =>) Applicative f => Monad f is still
> > discussed the default methods would be a step towards the goal.
> I like it. It's indeed a good step towards:
> Why not formally propose this?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
More information about the Libraries