Why base 4.4.0.0 does not use default signatures extention (new in GHC 7.2)?
Bas van Dijk
v.dijk.bas at gmail.com
Fri Sep 23 14:46:32 CEST 2011
On 22 September 2011 06:18, Maciej Marcin Piechotka
<uzytkownik2 at gmail.com> wrote:
> While the Functor f => (Pointed f =>) Applicative f => Monad f is still
> discussed the default methods would be a step towards the goal.
I like it. It's indeed a good step towards:
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/DefaultSuperclassInstances
Why not formally propose this?
Regards,
Bas
More information about the Libraries
mailing list