ANNOUNCE: deepseq-

Yitzchak Gale gale at
Thu Nov 19 06:45:15 EST 2009

Simon Marlow wrote:
> So then what shall we call the a -> () version?
> One possibility is to go back to calling it rnf.

In light of apfelmus' comment, I vote for rnf.

And in that case, how about the analogous
alternative for seq itself:

hnf :: a -> ()


More information about the Libraries mailing list