Failure to install time package

[Bulat Ziganshin]

Hello Lennart,

Thursday, April 16, 2009, 2:18:04 PM, you wrote:

6.10.2.1 will also make some things worse. every other (release)
version is x.y.z and both people and software may have troubles
dealing with non-standard version number

> I agree with Bulat.  Having two different versions of 6.10.2 in
> circulation is bad.
> You could call it 6.10.2.1 if 6.10.3 is offensive.

>   -- Lennart

> On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 12:07 PM, Bulat Ziganshin
> <bulat.ziganshin at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hello Simon,
>>
>> Thursday, April 16, 2009, 1:32:57 PM, you wrote:
>>
>>> We hope that someone at this weekend's will put up a binary
>>> distribution of 'time' for GHC 6.10.2.  If they don't, we'll re-roll
>>> the 6.10.2 bundle (on Windows only) including time again, so that you can re-download.
>>
>> Simon, this solves only part of the problems, especially second
>> variant. imagine 6.10.2 versions flying around with and without time
>> package.
>>
>> i think that most reliable way to solve it is to issue 6.10.3 ASAP
>> with just one change - this package returned back. this means a lot of
>> extra work for packagers but will greatly simplify further life for
>> users
>>
>>
>> --
>> Best regards,
>>  Bulat                            mailto:Bulat.Ziganshin at gmail.com
>>



-- 
Best regards,
 Bulat                            mailto:Bulat.Ziganshin at gmail.com