Failure to install time package

[Lennart Augustsson]

I agree with Bulat.  Having two different versions of 6.10.2 in
circulation is bad.
You could call it 6.10.2.1 if 6.10.3 is offensive.

  -- Lennart

On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 12:07 PM, Bulat Ziganshin
<bulat.ziganshin at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello Simon,
>
> Thursday, April 16, 2009, 1:32:57 PM, you wrote:
>
>> We hope that someone at this weekend's will put up a binary
>> distribution of 'time' for GHC 6.10.2.  If they don't, we'll re-roll
>> the 6.10.2 bundle (on Windows only) including time again, so that you can re-download.
>
> Simon, this solves only part of the problems, especially second
> variant. imagine 6.10.2 versions flying around with and without time
> package.
>
> i think that most reliable way to solve it is to issue 6.10.3 ASAP
> with just one change - this package returned back. this means a lot of
> extra work for packagers but will greatly simplify further life for
> users
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
>  Bulat                            mailto:Bulat.Ziganshin at gmail.com
>