[jhc] JHC benchmark.

[Lemmih]

On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 1:59 PM, Lemmih<lemmih at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 1:32 PM, John Meacham<john at repetae.net> wrote:
>> On Sat, Sep 05, 2009 at 12:35:54PM +0200, Lemmih wrote:
>>> On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 4:32 AM, John Meacham<john at repetae.net> wrote:
>>> > Hmm.. looks like many are failing due to the unpacked poly bug, as shown
>>> > by regression test 'tests.bugs.UnpackedPoly'. Combined with the newtype
>>> > unpacking bug pointed out by droundy earlier, I think it is time for me
>>> > to take a look at unpacked fields.
>>>
>>> x2n1 is quite interesting. It generated the wrong answer with the GC
>>> enabled but works fine without it.
>>
>> Yes, I think I am pushing the boehm GC further than it was designed for
>> at times :)
>>
>> My recent patches sent to the list fix a few bugs that were keeping some
>> of the benchmarks from compiling.
>
> I'm re-running the benchmark now.

18/73 with jhc-0.7.2-17.

-- 
Cheers,
  Lemmih