[jhc] JHC benchmark.

[Lemmih]

On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 1:32 PM, John Meacham<john at repetae.net> wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 05, 2009 at 12:35:54PM +0200, Lemmih wrote:
>> On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 4:32 AM, John Meacham<john at repetae.net> wrote:
>> > Hmm.. looks like many are failing due to the unpacked poly bug, as shown
>> > by regression test 'tests.bugs.UnpackedPoly'. Combined with the newtype
>> > unpacking bug pointed out by droundy earlier, I think it is time for me
>> > to take a look at unpacked fields.
>>
>> x2n1 is quite interesting. It generated the wrong answer with the GC
>> enabled but works fine without it.
>
> Yes, I think I am pushing the boehm GC further than it was designed for
> at times :)
>
> My recent patches sent to the list fix a few bugs that were keeping some
> of the benchmarks from compiling.

I'm re-running the benchmark now.

-- 
Cheers,
  Lemmih