[jhc] JHC benchmark.
John Meacham
john at repetae.net
Sat Sep 5 07:32:57 EDT 2009
On Sat, Sep 05, 2009 at 12:35:54PM +0200, Lemmih wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 4:32 AM, John Meacham<john at repetae.net> wrote:
> > Hmm.. looks like many are failing due to the unpacked poly bug, as shown
> > by regression test 'tests.bugs.UnpackedPoly'. Combined with the newtype
> > unpacking bug pointed out by droundy earlier, I think it is time for me
> > to take a look at unpacked fields.
>
> x2n1 is quite interesting. It generated the wrong answer with the GC
> enabled but works fine without it.
Yes, I think I am pushing the boehm GC further than it was designed for
at times :)
My recent patches sent to the list fix a few bugs that were keeping some
of the benchmarks from compiling.
John
--
John Meacham - ⑆repetae.net⑆john⑈ - http://notanumber.net/
More information about the jhc
mailing list