The future of Haskell discussion
S. Alexander Jacobson
Fri, 14 Sep 2001 01:29:01 -0400 (Eastern Daylight Time)
Out of curiosity, how does GTK+ compare with Fruit?
It seems like it would make sense for the standard Haskell GUI also to be
PS I don't do GUI stuff so I don't really know much. I did read the Fruit
paper and it looked interesting.
On Fri, 14 Sep 2001, Manuel M. T. Chakravarty wrote:
> Wolfgang Jeltsch <email@example.com> wrote,
> > That's why I
> > think GTK+ should be used mainly to develop applications which are intended
> > to run under GNOME and preferably not to do cross-plattform GUI programming.
> > I think the best solution for the latter thing is to use a library which has
> > multiple implementations based on different "native" libraries like Win32,
> > GTK+, Qt. wxWindows (http://www.wxwindows.org/) is an example for this kind
> > of library.
> wxWindows is quite C++ centric and AFAIK nobody has made a
> serious effort at a C++ FFI yet. One of the big advantages
> of GTK+ is that it was written with bindings for other
> languages in mind. Therefore, it is probably the toolkit
> with the most language bindings.
> One alternative would be to standardise on a kind of subset
> of the GTK+ API and then somebody with a lot of spare time
> could implement that on top of the Win32 API natively - in
> the meantime, the original GTK+ libraries would at least
> provide some form of implementation under Win32. (You
> should bear in mind that anything that doesn't build on
> existing infrastructure involves a lot of coding and I
> haven't seen many volunteers stepping forward yet.)
> Haskell mailing list
S. Alexander Jacobson Shop.Com
1-646-638-2300 voice The Easiest Way To Shop (sm)