<rant>Unicode stupidity</rant> (Was: Unicode support)
"Jürgen A. Erhard"
Wed, 24 Oct 2001 14:16:46 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>>>>> "Marcin" =3D=3D Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk <email@example.com> writes:
Marcin> 30 Sep 2001 22:28:52 +0900, Jens Petersen <firstname.lastname@example.org>=
>> 16 bits is enough to describe the Basic Multilingual Plane
>> and I think 24 bits all the currently defined extended
>> planes. [...]
Just for reference... "currently" is the important word here.
[Snipped interesting and (hopefully) enlightening stuff about Unicode
Marcin> IMHO it would have been better to not invent UTF-16 at all
Marcin> and use UTF-8 in parallel with UTF-32. But Unicode used to
Marcin> promote UTF-16 as the real Unicode, and now it causes so
Marcin> many threads on Unicode list to clear the confusion about
Marcin> the nature of characters above U+FFFF.
IMPPOO is would have been (and would still be) better to simply say
"Here's UTF-8, and ISO 10646 is 31 bits, encoded as real 32 bit units
or as UTF-8". That's the baseline.
None of that "But 21 bits *is* enough". Yeah, like 640K was enough.
And countless other examples.
I thought we had learned, but I was wrong... I'm especially
disheartened to hear that ISO bought into the same crap.
PS: Yep, this has been an entirely off-topic rant. I simply couldn't
resist the urge, the need, to vent a bit.
J=FCrgen A. Erhard (email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org)
My WebHome: http://jerhard.org
SPACE: Above And Beyond (http://www.planetx.com/space:aab)
I have a firm grip on reality, now I can strangle it.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----