Whose gonna be at icfp?

[Carter Schonwald]

Either way, see y'all in oxford

On Sat, Aug 26, 2017 at 6:30 PM Carter Schonwald <carter.schonwald at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Agreed.  Hence let's just have something less structured than the GitHub
> flow ... just any doc will do. Also it'd be simpler to have just one tool
> for coms.
>
> On Sat, Aug 26, 2017 at 12:55 PM Mario Blažević <blamario at ciktel.net>
> wrote:
>
>> On 2017-08-25 06:48 PM, Carter Schonwald wrote:
>> > I'll be this time! :)
>> >
>> > We should coord a committee catch-up at icfp.
>> >
>> > Also I would like to propose we shift back to email based discussion.
>> > There's still the valid and important need of then taking the
>> > discussion and revisions into a new standard. But let's at least make
>> > the first half lighter weight perhaps? the pattern that's working for
>> > ghc proposals doesn't seem to matchup with what works for h2020
>>
>>      I'll be there as well. As for the e-mail based discussion, my
>> feeling for the last while has been that I'd rather bring something,
>> anything, to completion. There's very little feedback and there's a real
>> danger that the discussion doesn't lead to any concrete change to the
>> standard.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Haskell-prime mailing list
>> Haskell-prime at haskell.org
>> http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell-prime/attachments/20170826/5a6819b8/attachment.html>