Whose gonna be at icfp?

[Carter Schonwald]

Agreed.  Hence let's just have something less structured than the GitHub
flow ... just any doc will do. Also it'd be simpler to have just one tool
for coms.

On Sat, Aug 26, 2017 at 12:55 PM Mario Blažević <blamario at ciktel.net> wrote:

> On 2017-08-25 06:48 PM, Carter Schonwald wrote:
> > I'll be this time! :)
> >
> > We should coord a committee catch-up at icfp.
> >
> > Also I would like to propose we shift back to email based discussion.
> > There's still the valid and important need of then taking the
> > discussion and revisions into a new standard. But let's at least make
> > the first half lighter weight perhaps? the pattern that's working for
> > ghc proposals doesn't seem to matchup with what works for h2020
>
>      I'll be there as well. As for the e-mail based discussion, my
> feeling for the last while has been that I'd rather bring something,
> anything, to completion. There's very little feedback and there's a real
> danger that the discussion doesn't lead to any concrete change to the
> standard.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Haskell-prime mailing list
> Haskell-prime at haskell.org
> http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell-prime/attachments/20170826/c765dc69/attachment.html>