Infrastructure & Communication

[Carter Schonwald]

Or a phabricator instance ? That might also make sense.

On Friday, April 29, 2016, Francesco Ariis <fa-ml at ariis.it> wrote:

> On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 11:56:51PM +0200, Herbert Valerio Riedel wrote:
> > One benefit I see from using GitHub is that this way would we be closer
> > to the Haskell community (given the majority of Hackage packages are
> > hosted on GitHub), and our work would be more transparent for the
> > community as well as offering a lower barrier to
> > participation/contribution.
> >
> > Moreover, I think GitHub would also help make our efforts/progress
> > towards a revised Haskell Report more visible to the community, which in
> > turn may even provide us the motivation to carry on...
>
> Hello,
>     personally I would be more likely to read/participate in the
> discussions if such discussions were hosted here or on Trac rather
> than Github.
> haskell-prime@ is just one 'subscribe' away, comes in a familiar package
> to haskell-cafe@ participants (a mailing list) and interface (their mail
> client); I cannot say the same about Github.
> Similarly, Trac allows me to follow new issues (new tickets notifications
> or the life of a single ticket in particular) via rss, without having to
> register to a new service.
>
> Of course:
>     1. this is just my experience -- there are many haskell
>        developers on Github and they probably like the workflow
>        there (I would still say the haskell-cafe@ audience is bigger
>        though).
>     2. I am not a committee member. In the end it's them who are going
>        to pour blood/sweat/tears in the report; whichever tool the
>        committee chooses is the right one
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell-prime/attachments/20160429/41ff2536/attachment.html>