[Haskell-cafe] LFVM-STG Compilation

Sven Panne svenpanne at gmail.com
Fri May 10 07:45:17 UTC 2019

Am Fr., 10. Mai 2019 um 00:05 Uhr schrieb Brandon Allbery <
allbery.b at gmail.com>:

> [...] In short, if you are still talking about Haskell, default-strict
> isn't an option. A strict Haskell-*like* language is an option, but it
> won't be Haskell; its idioms will be different and library compatibility
> will be dubious at best.

+1. I think one (quite old) point has been missed so far in this
discussion: "Strict evaluation is fundamentally flawed for function
reuse.", see http://augustss.blogspot.com/2011/05/.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell-cafe/attachments/20190510/80895d10/attachment.html>

More information about the Haskell-Cafe mailing list