[Haskell-cafe] [Haskell] GHC is a monopoly compiler
amindfv at gmail.com
Tue Sep 27 03:33:10 UTC 2016
Thanks for the graceful reply! So as not to think I'm singling anyone out,
I should say the "hatchet job" comment above is also the kind of thing very
few of us want to be part of our day-to-day conversation.
Everyone makes mistakes, not a big thing! It's just important that, on
average, when people come visit our corner of the internet the thing they
see isn't people saying hurtful things to each other. When I started here I
felt like I could ask a question and not be ridiculed for it. Others should
have the same feeling when they come by.
On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 12:24 PM, Michael Sloan <mgsloan at gmail.com> wrote:
> Fair point, my mistake, sorry. I will try to tone it down and be a
> more civil communicator. To me equating the Haskell Platform with
> python's batteries included approach is laughable, so I laughed.
> I find Brandon's opinions on things to often be diametrically opposed
> to my own, and this seems to be a cause of a great deal of contention.
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 8:20 PM, Tom Murphy <amindfv at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 12:11 PM, Michael Sloan <mgsloan at gmail.com>
> >> LOL! Oh man, this guy must be pulling my leg... Haskell platform was
> >> never a batteries included plan. It was a plan for package
> >> bureaucracy, mixed in with a broken installation approach. Sorry, but
> >> that was not a good enough attempt at emulating python's "batteries
> >> included" . From https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0206/
> > The substance of your positions on packaging/HP aside, it has been 15
> > since SPJ's email about having more respectful discussion in our
> > Please speak with civility.
> > Tom
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Haskell-Cafe