[Haskell-cafe] Proposal: (.:) operator in base.
tom-lists-haskell-cafe-2013 at jaguarpaw.co.uk
Tue Aug 23 07:09:19 UTC 2016
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 10:23:07PM -0700, wren romano wrote:
> (.) f g = \x -> f (g x)
> (.) f g x = f (g x)
> has ramifications, though it's fairly easy to guess which one of those
> two will be most performant.
Are these not synonyms? What is the meaning of
fargs var = expr
fargs = \var -> expr
More information about the Haskell-Cafe