[Haskell-cafe] Re: Rewriting a famous library and using the same name: pros and cons

Ivan Lazar Miljenovic ivan.miljenovic at gmail.com
Sat Jul 3 09:46:50 EDT 2010

Stephen Tetley <stephen.tetley at gmail.com> writes:

> On 3 July 2010 14:00, Ivan Lazar Miljenovic <ivan.miljenovic at gmail.com> wrote:
>> So this argument isn't valid ;-)
> I think it was Hugs compliant as least for some revisions - I seem to
> remember looking at it before I switched to GHC.

Actually, how would you call it in Hugs?  Just start it explicitly with
the -98 flag?

These modules currently don't load by default in ghci, since all the
extensions are specified in the cabal file rather than in the source
files with LANGUAGE pragmas.

Ivan Lazar Miljenovic
Ivan.Miljenovic at gmail.com

More information about the Haskell-Cafe mailing list