[Haskell-cafe] Re: Rewriting a famous library and using the same name: pros and cons

[Ivan Lazar Miljenovic]

Stephen Tetley <stephen.tetley at gmail.com> writes:

> On 3 July 2010 14:00, Ivan Lazar Miljenovic <ivan.miljenovic at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> So this argument isn't valid ;-)
>
> I think it was Hugs compliant as least for some revisions - I seem to
> remember looking at it before I switched to GHC.

Actually, how would you call it in Hugs?  Just start it explicitly with
the -98 flag?

These modules currently don't load by default in ghci, since all the
extensions are specified in the cabal file rather than in the source
files with LANGUAGE pragmas.

-- 
Ivan Lazar Miljenovic
Ivan.Miljenovic at gmail.com
IvanMiljenovic.wordpress.com