[Haskell-cafe] Comments requested: succ Java
John A. De Goes
john at n-brain.net
Mon Sep 28 09:01:50 EDT 2009
Interop between Haskell and Java is too difficult to be practical. And
I stand by my statement that no Java shop is going to switch over to
Haskell, precisely because they cannot afford to abandon either their
existing investment, or the _billions of dollars_ worth of commercial-
friendly open source libraries available for the Java platform.
But I do agree on this: the JVM does indeed need a Haskell-like
John A. De Goes
The Evolution of Collaboration
http://www.n-brain.net | 877-376-2724 x 101
On Sep 27, 2009, at 8:10 PM, Curt Sampson wrote:
> On 2009-09-27 10:36 -0600 (Sun), John A. De Goes wrote:
>> I'm not sure what the point of your series is. No one who is using
>> now commercially can move to Haskell because Haskell doesn't run on
> That's a rather strong statement, and I don't accept it. I can not
> think of many possible circumstances where it would be possible for a
> Java-using shop to write a piece of software that doesn't run on the
> JVM, but I have sween many of these. There are lots of shops out there
> using, e.g., C++ code as well as Java code, who are already obviously
> able to use non-JVM languages.
> Given that, one point would be to show that there are more benefits
> to be gained by switching from Java to Haskell than there are from
> switching from Java to one of the other languages mentioned. This
> may be
> enough to tip some shops into Haskell.
> Second, it might inspire people to have a look at bringing a more
> Haskell-like language to the JVM, or add more Haskell-like features to
> existing JVM languages.
> Third, even if a shop is not going to switch, having people understand
> what's out there, and where many of these ideas come from, is a good
> thing, I feel.
> Curt Sampson <cjs at starling-software.com> +81 90 7737 2974
> Functional programming in all senses of the word:
More information about the Haskell-Cafe