[Haskell-cafe] Reply to
daniel.is.fischer at web.de
Wed May 6 06:42:38 EDT 2009
Am Mittwoch 06 Mai 2009 11:05:05 schrieb Magnus Therning:
> On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 7:51 AM, Ashok Gautham
> <scriptdevil.haskell at gmail.com> wrote:
> > I feel that the haskell mailing lists must have the reply-to field set,
> > so that a person can reply to the list by just clicking reply.
> > I am unsure if I am the only one facing this problem.
> This is a contentious issue:
May I add
> I personally think mailing-lists shouldn't put themselves in the
> Reply-To, and that easy replying to the list is something that should
> be handled in the mail client (I base my choice of mail client on
Indeed. I have reply, reply-to-all and reply-to-list one click or one key combination
away, and as far as I know those features are present in almost all mail clients since
several years, so ease of replying to list shouldn't be an issue.
On the other hand, I do not want messages intended to be private communications to end up
on the list, which would happen more easily with munged headers.
So, count me in the leave-reply-to-alone camp.
> What client are you using?
More information about the Haskell-Cafe