[Haskell-cafe] Re: Data constructors versus types

[Achim Schneider]

"Richard A. O'Keefe" <ok at cs.otago.ac.nz> wrote:

> I have no idea what get/cc might be, unless it is a mistake for
> call/cc, but that's Scheme, not Lisp.
>
Erm... yes. I guess it's the part of call/cc that gets the continuation
before calling it.

Actually, I shouldn't be talking about stuff that was used before I was
even planned...


-- 
(c) this sig last receiving data processing entity. Inspect headers for
past copyright information. All rights reserved. Unauthorised copying,
hiring, renting, public performance and/or broadcasting of this
signature prohibited.