[Haskell-cafe] Re: Data constructors versus types
Richard A. O'Keefe
ok at cs.otago.ac.nz
Wed Jan 16 22:38:54 EST 2008
On 17 Jan 2008, at 12:31 pm, Achim Schneider wrote:
> Lisp is actually not really meant to be compiled, but interpreted.
The "classic" Lisp is Lisp 1.5.
The Lisp 1.5 Programmer's Manual, published in I think 1961,
contains "Appendix D: The Lisp Compiler".
If I'm reading appendix G correctly, the compiler was under
4000 words of storage.
> nice thing is that it doesn't need more than a handful of
> primitives, a
> list parser and heap manager/garbage collector and evaluator, which
> can be implemented in under 1000 lines of C. Things get more involved
> with get/cc, but then how many C programmers ever heard of setjmp...
I have no idea what get/cc might be, unless it is a mistake for call/cc,
but that's Scheme, not Lisp. "Classic" Lisp stack management wasn't
any harder than Pascal stack management (in part because classic
still struggling to get closures right).
More information about the Haskell-Cafe