bf3 at telenet.be
Mon Oct 15 06:50:30 EDT 2007
Yes, exactly, but how does one call the way of programming without
monads / do notation then, explicitly passing the "object"? Does this
approach have a name? Or just "non-monadic style"?
Henning Thielemann wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Oct 2007, Peter Verswyvelen wrote:
>>> Actually I stopped bothering long ago about 'understanding monads'.
>> I think that's a shame, because when I wrote the source code myself
>> to get
>> from a pure functional approach (passing the "object" from function to
>> function as an extra argument) to a monadic approach,
> where "monadic" is still "pure functional", but somehow tries to hide
More information about the Haskell-Cafe