[Haskell-cafe] do

[Henning Thielemann]

On Mon, 15 Oct 2007, Peter Verswyvelen wrote:

>> Actually I stopped bothering long ago about 'understanding monads'.
>
> I think that's a shame, because when I wrote the source code myself to get
> from a pure functional approach (passing the "object" from function to
> function as an extra argument) to a monadic approach,

where "monadic" is still "pure functional", but somehow tries to hide that