[Haskell-cafe] Project postmortem II /Haskell vs. Erlang/

[Joel Reymont]

Sure. Type classes, as Ketil Malde has suggested.

On Jan 4, 2006, at 2:09 AM, Dylan Thurston wrote:

> Looking at this code, I wonder if there are better ways to express
> what you really want using static typing.  To wit, with records, you
> give an example
>
>
> data Pot = Pot
>     {
>      pProfit :: !Word64,
>      pAmounts :: ![Word64] -- Word16/
>     } deriving (Show, Typeable)

--
http://wagerlabs.com/