Binary bloat in 7.10

[Jeremy]

Roman Cheplyaka-2 wrote
> I'm not denying (or confirming) your claim, but it would look more
> legitimate if you compared the same version of Cabal compiled with
> different versions of GHC.
> 
> At least some of this bloat could be because Cabal simply gained more
> code.

Tricky to test that because of dependencies and global package db.

I haven't measured the amount of code in Cabal, but I doubt it's increased
that much, and there has been a big jump in the installed size of every
library.



--
View this message in context: http://haskell.1045720.n5.nabble.com/Binary-bloat-in-7-10-tp5768067p5768080.html
Sent from the Haskell - Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.