PROPOSAL: Literate haskell and module file names

[Merijn Verstraaten]

My personal approach would have been to make ghc accept "Foo.*.lhs", maintaining a list of potential file format seems arduous and error prone.

Cheers,
Merijn

On Mar 16, 2014, at 14:13 , Joachim Breitner wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Am Sonntag, den 16.03.2014, 13:56 +0100 schrieb Merijn Verstraaten:
>> Cons:
> 
> GHC would have to either maintain a possibly long of variants to look
> for ([".hs", ".lhs", ".rst.lhs", ".md.lhs", ".svg.lhs", ".docx.lhs"]),
> or look for "Foo.*.lhs".
> 
> I’d find the latter acceptable, but it should be noted.
> 
> Greetings,
> Joachim
> 
> -- 
> Joachim “nomeata” Breitner
>  mail at joachim-breitner.de • http://www.joachim-breitner.de/
>  Jabber: nomeata at joachim-breitner.de  • GPG-Key: 0x4743206C
>  Debian Developer: nomeata at debian.org
> _______________________________________________
> Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
> Glasgow-haskell-users at haskell.org
> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/glasgow-haskell-users/attachments/20140316/d135db57/attachment.sig>