PROPOSAL: Literate haskell and module file names

[Carter Schonwald]

Idk, this behavior of doing Data.Vector.lhs seems pretty awesome.  I
actually might start doing that.  That ghc allows that seems pretty darn
awesome. And handy too

On Sunday, March 16, 2014, Merijn Verstraaten <merijn at inconsistent.nl>
wrote:

> My personal approach would have been to make ghc accept "Foo.*.lhs",
> maintaining a list of potential file format seems arduous and error prone.
>
> Cheers,
> Merijn
>
> On Mar 16, 2014, at 14:13 , Joachim Breitner wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Am Sonntag, den 16.03.2014, 13:56 +0100 schrieb Merijn Verstraaten:
> >> Cons:
> >
> > GHC would have to either maintain a possibly long of variants to look
> > for ([".hs", ".lhs", ".rst.lhs", ".md.lhs", ".svg.lhs", ".docx.lhs"]),
> > or look for "Foo.*.lhs".
> >
> > I’d find the latter acceptable, but it should be noted.
> >
> > Greetings,
> > Joachim
> >
> > --
> > Joachim “nomeata” Breitner
> >  mail at joachim-breitner.de <javascript:;> •
> http://www.joachim-breitner.de/
> >  Jabber: nomeata at joachim-breitner.de <javascript:;>  • GPG-Key:
> 0x4743206C
> >  Debian Developer: nomeata at debian.org <javascript:;>
> > _______________________________________________
> > Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
> > Glasgow-haskell-users at haskell.org <javascript:;>
> > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/glasgow-haskell-users/attachments/20140316/e2a3b40d/attachment.html>