PROPOSAL: Literate haskell and module file names

[Carter Schonwald]

I'd rather there be some textual finger print in the module itself that be
be used to signal the literate format. But if there's a Case to be made in
open to it I guess.

On Sunday, March 16, 2014, Joachim Breitner <mail at joachim-breitner.de>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Am Sonntag, den 16.03.2014, 13:56 +0100 schrieb Merijn Verstraaten:
> > Cons:
>
> GHC would have to either maintain a possibly long of variants to look
> for ([".hs", ".lhs", ".rst.lhs", ".md.lhs", ".svg.lhs", ".docx.lhs"]),
> or look for "Foo.*.lhs".
>
> I’d find the latter acceptable, but it should be noted.
>
> Greetings,
> Joachim
>
> --
> Joachim “nomeata” Breitner
>   mail at joachim-breitner.de <javascript:;> •
> http://www.joachim-breitner.de/
>   Jabber: nomeata at joachim-breitner.de <javascript:;>  • GPG-Key:
> 0x4743206C
>   Debian Developer: nomeata at debian.org <javascript:;>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/glasgow-haskell-users/attachments/20140316/ca07c563/attachment.html>