[ghc-steering-committee] Record dot syntax: vote results

[Iavor Diatchki]

Thanks Joachim!    I'd be curious the hear an opinion from someone who
prefers `C2a` to `C4`, about why it is better?   To me `C2a` just looks
like a more complicated version of `C4`.

-Iavor


On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 9:58 AM Richard Eisenberg <rae at richarde.dev> wrote:

> I think this is a fine conclusion to the saga, personally. C2a is one of
> the more middle-of-the-ground options, and it's refreshing to have an
> election that chooses such a candidate.
>
> It's been slow, yes, but I think this phase of the saga has highlighted
> the strengths of the committee process, in that we had a deliberate,
> carefully reasoned vote.
>
> Thanks for running the vote algorithm, Joachim, and for your careful
> shepherding, Simon.
>
> Richard
>
> > On Mar 30, 2020, at 5:48 PM, Joachim Breitner <mail at joachim-breitner.de>
> wrote:
> >
> > Dear Committe,
> >
> > thanks all for voting. The ranking of votes is now
> >
> >      C2a > C2b > C4 > C1 > C7 > C6 > C3 > C5
> >
> > In particular C2a beats every other options by 7:4 or more, and is
> > therefore the result of this poll.
> >
> > You can see more statistics at
> > https://www.condorcet.vote/Vote/AB23CE70AC/
> >
> > So, does this conclude this saga?
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Joachim
> >
> > --
> > Joachim Breitner
> >  mail at joachim-breitner.de
> >  http://www.joachim-breitner.de/
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > ghc-steering-committee mailing list
> > ghc-steering-committee at haskell.org
> > https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-steering-committee
>
> _______________________________________________
> ghc-steering-committee mailing list
> ghc-steering-committee at haskell.org
> https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-steering-committee
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/ghc-steering-committee/attachments/20200330/e425f621/attachment.html>