[ghc-steering-committee] committee constitution

[Alejandro Serrano Mena]

El lun., 13 jul. 2020 a las 13:58, Richard Eisenberg (<rae at richarde.dev>)
escribió:

>
>
> To summarize where we are in this thread:
>
> I asked:
>
>
> How should we ensure that various constituencies are well served by our
> process?
>
>  A. By having shepherds reach out to community members external to the
> committee who can share their expert opinion
>  B. By maintaining a list of constituencies that the committee membership
> covers (ideally)
>
>
> I said B
> Vitaly said A+B
> Joachim said A
> Iavor said neither
>
> Do others have opinions?
>
>
I lean towards A, but of course not having to see external members and have
all stakeholders in the Committee would be great too.

Alejandro
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/ghc-steering-committee/attachments/20200713/0e61cdd9/attachment.html>