[ghc-steering-committee] Proposal: Reject #44 NoIfThenElse

Manuel M T Chakravarty chak at justtesting.org
Tue May 16 23:01:22 UTC 2017


Completely agree.

Manuel

> Iavor Diatchki <iavor.diatchki at gmail.com>:
> 
> Hello,
> 
> I'd like to propose that we reject that NoIfThenElse proposal (#44).   In short, it suggests that we remove the syntactic sugar for `if-then-else` and leave to programmers to define their own version as a function.
> 
> I think that this has virtually no benefits and many draw-backs, including breaking existing code, and making programs more difficult to read.
> 
> Would there be any objections if I was to mark this as rejected, and close the request?
> 
> -Iavor
> _______________________________________________
> ghc-steering-committee mailing list
> ghc-steering-committee at haskell.org
> https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-steering-committee



More information about the ghc-steering-committee mailing list