[ghc-steering-committee] Proposal: Reject #44 NoIfThenElse
Manuel M T Chakravarty
chak at justtesting.org
Tue May 16 23:01:22 UTC 2017
Completely agree.
Manuel
> Iavor Diatchki <iavor.diatchki at gmail.com>:
>
> Hello,
>
> I'd like to propose that we reject that NoIfThenElse proposal (#44). In short, it suggests that we remove the syntactic sugar for `if-then-else` and leave to programmers to define their own version as a function.
>
> I think that this has virtually no benefits and many draw-backs, including breaking existing code, and making programs more difficult to read.
>
> Would there be any objections if I was to mark this as rejected, and close the request?
>
> -Iavor
> _______________________________________________
> ghc-steering-committee mailing list
> ghc-steering-committee at haskell.org
> https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-steering-committee
More information about the ghc-steering-committee
mailing list