[ghc-steering-committee] Proposal: Reject #44 NoIfThenElse
Simon Marlow
marlowsd at gmail.com
Tue May 16 18:21:53 UTC 2017
Agreed.
On 16 May 2017 at 18:19, Iavor Diatchki <iavor.diatchki at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'd like to propose that we reject that NoIfThenElse proposal (#44). In
> short, it suggests that we remove the syntactic sugar for `if-then-else`
> and leave to programmers to define their own version as a function.
>
> I think that this has virtually no benefits and many draw-backs, including
> breaking existing code, and making programs more difficult to read.
>
> Would there be any objections if I was to mark this as rejected, and close
> the request?
>
> -Iavor
>
> _______________________________________________
> ghc-steering-committee mailing list
> ghc-steering-committee at haskell.org
> https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-steering-committee
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/ghc-steering-committee/attachments/20170516/7ce2953c/attachment.html>
More information about the ghc-steering-committee
mailing list