<div dir="ltr">Agreed.</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 16 May 2017 at 18:19, Iavor Diatchki <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:iavor.diatchki@gmail.com" target="_blank">iavor.diatchki@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">Hello,<div><br></div><div>I'd like to propose that we reject that NoIfThenElse proposal (#44).   In short, it suggests that we remove the syntactic sugar for `if-then-else` and leave to programmers to define their own version as a function.</div><div><br></div><div>I think that this has virtually no benefits and many draw-backs, including breaking existing code, and making programs more difficult to read.</div><div><br></div><div>Would there be any objections if I was to mark this as rejected, and close the request?</div><span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><div><br></div><div>-Iavor</div></font></span></div>
<br>______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
ghc-steering-committee mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:ghc-steering-committee@haskell.org">ghc-steering-committee@<wbr>haskell.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-steering-committee" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://mail.haskell.org/cgi-<wbr>bin/mailman/listinfo/ghc-<wbr>steering-committee</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>