[ghc-steering-committee] Proposal: Reject #44 NoIfThenElse

[Joachim Breitner]

Hi,

Am Dienstag, den 16.05.2017, 10:19 -0700 schrieb Iavor Diatchki:
> I'd like to propose that we reject that NoIfThenElse proposal (#44).

proceduraly, this is not required. This proposal never made it out of
the discussion phase, and is actually “dormant” right now (together
with plenty of other proposals that never made it out of the discussion
procedure). While everyone is free to voice their opinions on such
proposals, the comment section on the pull request is more appropriate
for that. Likely, the author might eventually withdraws the proposal.

Note that dormant proposals do not even show up in the
“List of proposals under discussion” linked from 
https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals.

If you are curious what actually is on the committee’s plate right now,
this would be the following.

Eval class
https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/27
Shepherd: Richard
Status: This came back after being sent to the author for revision.
We are waiting for Richard to make a new decision suggestion.

Force Instance
https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/23
Shepherd: Manuel
Status: Manuel suggests rejection, which is generally agreed by the
committee.
Manuel, I believe you can go ahead and reject the proposal, ideally
with a short rationale.

UNPACK on function arguments
https://github.com/ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals/pull/46
Shepherd: Simon Marlow
Status: Awaiting a recommendation from Simon


Greetings,
Joachim

-- 
Joachim “nomeata” Breitner
  mail at joachim-breitner.de • https://www.joachim-breitner.de/
  XMPP: nomeata at joachim-breitner.de • OpenPGP-Key: 0xF0FBF51F
  Debian Developer: nomeata at debian.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/ghc-steering-committee/attachments/20170516/27a5ae55/attachment.sig>