nofib on Shake

Joachim Breitner mail at joachim-breitner.de
Mon Jan 9 21:05:49 UTC 2017


Hi,

Am Montag, den 09.01.2017, 19:48 +0000 schrieb Michal Terepeta:
> On Sun, Jan 8, 2017 at 10:56 PM Joachim Breitner <mail at joachim-breitner.de> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Am Sonntag, den 08.01.2017, 13:45 -0500 schrieb Ben Gamari:
> > > > We could also create a cabal and stack files for `nofib-analyse` (making
> > > > it possible to use some libraries for it).
> > > >
> > > This would be great. This would allow me to drop a submodule from my own
> > > performance monitoring tool.
> >
> > Exists since last April:
> > http://hackage.haskell.org/package/nofib-analyse
> >
> > Only the binary so far, though, but good enough for
> > "cabal install nofib-analyse".
> 
> Oh, interesting! But now I'm a bit confused - what's the relationship
> > between https://github.com/nomeata/nofib-analyse and
> https://git.haskell.org/nofib.git, e.g., is the github repo the
> upstream for nofib-anaylse and the haskell.org one for the other parts
> of nofib? Or is the github one just a mirror and all patches should go
> to haskell.org repo?

my repo occasionally pulls in the nofib-analyse directory from the
haskell.org nofib repo; see for example this commit (especially its
message):
https://github.com/nomeata/nofib-analyse/commit/8225e0dd84c3c31cd156d10df75ea47ea29eda87

So yes, patches go to the haskell.org nofib repo (or Phab or whatever).

Greetings,
Joachim
-- 
Joachim “nomeata” Breitner
  mail at joachim-breitner.dehttps://www.joachim-breitner.de/
  XMPP: nomeata at joachim-breitner.de • OpenPGP-Key: 0xF0FBF51F
  Debian Developer: nomeata at debian.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/ghc-devs/attachments/20170109/dea73679/attachment.sig>


More information about the ghc-devs mailing list