[GHC] #8173: GHC uses nub
Kim-Ee Yeoh
ky3 at atamo.com
Fri Sep 27 22:41:09 UTC 2013
Salam Muhaimin,
So to answer my own question, the current practice seems to be to just
eyeball
> Geometric Mean -0.0% -0.0% -0.3% -0.1% +0.1%
and if the numbers are within historical epsilons of 0, that means no
change.
For a moment, I thought this was some erratically behaving VM.
The compile times are across-the-board lower, nice!
-- Kim-Ee
On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 4:39 AM, Muhaimin Ahsan <leroux at fezrev.com> wrote:
> Kim-Ee,
>
> The updated fib-analyse report from a few hours ago is posted here:
> https://gist.github.com/leroux/6725810#file-headvordnub-analysis-L2988
> Comment (http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/8173#comment:9)
>
> Sorry for the misunderstanding.
>
> Muhaimin
>
> On Sep 27, 2013, at 3:56 PM, Kim-Ee Yeoh <ky3 at atamo.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 8:14 PM, GHC <ghc-devs at haskell.org> wrote:
>
>> A 5% improvement in compile time is remarkable, if it's true. Great! But
>> I'm always worried about the noise in compile times measured in seconds.
>>
>
> Does anyone else think the noise in runtimes is alarming considering that
> the following is the fib-analysis of /binary-identical/ programs?
>
> > Min -0.1% -0.0% -25.4% -32.2% -1.3%
> > Max +0.1% +0.0% +19.0% +22.2% +10.0%
>
> Shouldn't we find an explanation for this before believing the compile
> time numbers? What would cause these wide swings on the benchmarking
> machine?
>
> p.s. For the record: Should do more rigorous statistical testing instead
> of naive percentages, yes?
>
> -- Kim-Ee
> _______________________________________________
> ghc-tickets mailing list
> ghc-tickets at haskell.org
> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-tickets
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ghc-devs mailing list
> ghc-devs at haskell.org
> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-devs
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/ghc-devs/attachments/20130928/ad70d704/attachment.htm>
More information about the ghc-devs
mailing list